Donald MacKay

Government policies are an attempt to change how the market behaves (importing too much? Let's impose an import duty). When government, in 2012, decided to move money from packaging companies, car makers, and steel fabricators to the mini-mills (companies making steel out of scrap metal), by way of the Price Preference System (PPS), and then later friendly Industrial Development Corporation finance and export duties, they made the steel from mini-mills cheaper relative to both imports and steel from ArcelorMittal South Africa (Amsa).

That is what economists call a trade-off and every policy decision has one, whether taken deliberately or not. Policies, by their nature, shift resources from one part of the economy (manufacturers, scrap recyclers, waste pickers, Amsa) to another part of the economy (mini-mills). This was the intention, but the assumption seems to be that shifting those resources would come at no cost. Wrong.

At the end of November 2023, Amsa announced that they were looking at closing their longs business in Newcastle, identifying the scrap metal policies as one of the reasons for the closure. Lots of meetings happened between Amsa and government for about a year. There was panic but the steel policies remained as they were. We saw some action on the anti-dumping and safeguard front, but mostly meh.

January 2025 swings around and Amsa again announced the closures of their long steel business but this time doesn't flinch. To keep that business open beyond January 31, the government stumped up R380 million. Bear in mind, we still have the same policies, but Amsa have been paid to stay open for longer while the haggling goes on behind the scenes. Amsa would like a few billion more.

And then Boom! On March 19, 2025, the International Trade Administration Commission (Itac) published the biggest tariff-and-other-stuff review in their 22-year history, and it's all focused on steel. This review considers 609 tariff codes, over four chapters, covering everything from chapter 72 (primary steel and stainless steel - why stainless steel?), 73 (articles of steel, like pipes and wire), 82 (tools and cutlery), and 83 (miscellaneous steel articles, like padlocks). This is R67 billion worth of imports. 355 of those tariff codes are being considered for a duty increase, adding R1.76bn to the tariff bill if they are all approved.

Three rebates (duty exemptions) might be removed, costing the 24 importers who use these rebates R87 million in duties per year if they go. Import permits are being considered for 61% of all steel imports. In other words, it's not just about the tariff anymore. You may be faced with a simple refusal to be allowed to import.

It doesn't end there. With no detail being provided, scrap metal (again), iron ore, and coking coal are being reviewed to see how their cost can be brought down to local consumers. Itac might, in other words, be looking to extend PPS to iron ore and coal. We exported R104bn of bituminous coal and R109bn of iron ore in 2024.

Imagine the impact of now forcing these mines, already under strain from our rail and ports, to also offer their minerals at a discount locally before being allowed to obtain an export permit. Itac has understandably complained about the difficulties in doing this on scrap metal. Imagine now doing this on a scale 20 times (at least) bigger than scrap metal.

Oh and possible safeguards and compulsory standards on "high-risk steel products".

Interested parties have four weeks (April 16) to comment. Yes, seriously.

The promise is that tariff investigations will complete in six months, but they take on average 27 months and those only cover a small handful of tariff codes each. If we take every single other open tariff investigation, some of which have been open for over 50 months, it is but a fraction of the scope of this investigation. Itac have to give initial feedback to the Minister by the end of June 2025.

There are nine other open tariff investigations covering these four chapters, along with three anti-dumping and two safeguard investigations. Oh wait! An anti-dumping investigation just kicked off on March 20, 2023 on galvanised steel from China.

The scale of the trade-offs to be made in this investigation are staggering. My concern is not with the scope so much as all of this is happening in a single review. It's like everything that was not done in the steel sector in a decade is now being done in a month.

Itac have still not published the results of their review of PPS on scrap metal, which was completed months ago. Given the enormous impact of this policy on Amsa, and the inclusion of scrap in this review, it's really important to publish the outcome of that review, before looking at other ways to reduce the price of scrap steel.

Consequential decisions made under pressure, even by the greatest minds, carry disproportionate risk. The downstream sector, employing 90% of the people in the steel value chain, is at existential risk. But so is Amsa and so are the mini-mills. It is not possible to please everyone. I hope the policy makers are carefully counting the cost of the decisions they are about to take on the steel sector. There will be losers. Let's not pretend otherwise. No matter what is decided, the steel industry will never look the same.

#steel

Navigating the impact of government decisions on South Africa's steel sector - Donald MacKay

Hulamin reports operational challenges amidst demand recovery in aluminium products

More mining smelters at risk of closure due to rising costs and falling ferrochrome prices